Why double standard ?

Double standardThe famous scholars, I have quoted in the article.

Why double standard ?

The formation of Pakistan was considered a great victory, but there were inconsistencies and contradictions right from the beginning and confusion has remained to this day.

jinnah

jinnah

Was Pakistan a nation for Muslims only?  If yes then why Jinnah say : We have many non-Muslims , Hindus , Christians and Parsis but they are all Pakistanis. They will enjoy the same rights and privileges as  any other citizens . You are free to go to your temples , mosques and to any other place of worship in this state of Pakistan. You will find that in course of time Hindu will  cease to be  Hindus and Muslims will cease to be Muslims. But before partition Jinnah was saying that they can not live together but after the partition he says “ they could live together”

Was it not a double standard?

Maulana Abul Kalam Azad with other Muslims

Maulana Abul Kalam Azad with other Muslims

Was Pakistan a nation for all Muslims of the Indian subcontinent? If so, Pakistan had failed at birth, as the majority of Muslims chose to remain in India. It shows that it was just a fiction that Pakistan was formed for the Muslims of India. But it must also be clear that Pakistan was formed for some Muslims  not for all Muslims of subcontinent.

  •  Pakistan
Liaqat Ali andPresiden Truman

Liaqat Ali andPresiden Truman

During his first US state visit from 3 May to 26 May 1950 , the first Prime minister of Pakistan, Liaqat Ali Khan , requested President of the United States, Harry Truman to help Pakistan in four ISSUES:
1. Economic help.
2. Financial and military equipment help for Pakistan Army .
3. LOC (line of control) issue between India and Pakistan.
4. Durand line issue between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

In case of LOC , Liaqat Ali Khan requested Harry Truman , not to recognize the LOC as the international border , because “ ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS LINE ONLY ONE NATION , THE MUSLIM KASHMIRIES, ARE LIVING .
But in case of Durand line , Liaqat Ali Khan requested Harry Truman to recognize the Durnad line as the international border. But why Harry Truman did not ask Liaqat Ali Khan , that the formula you are applying for LOC that on both sides one Muslim nation Kashmiris are living , then the same formula must also be applied  for DURAND LINE because there also on both sides lives one nation, the PUKHTUNS, and they are Muslims,

Was the Liaqat Ali Khan’s proposal was not a double standard? And why Harry Truman couldn’t ask him about it ? And why still USA recognizes the Durand Line as the international border but not line of control (LOC) which India also wants.

IS IT NOT A DOUBLE STANDARD?

  • CHINA

4The McMahon Line which is also called LAC ( Line of Actual Control), is the effective boundary between China and India. This line is named after Sir Henry McMahon, foreign secretary of the British-run Government of India . He had drawn this line in 1914 between China and India , as Durand line had been drawn in 1893 by Mortimer Durand , foreign secretary of the British-run Government of India between British India and Afghanistan.
China does not recognize the McMahon Line as an international border BUT recognizes the Durand line as the international border , however both were drawn by the British Empire.

IS IT NOT A DOUBLE STANDARD?

  • BERLIN WALL
Berlin Wall

Berlin Wall

Every year on November 9 , 1989 , throughout the European union and the remaining world community celebrate the fall of BERLIN WALL , arguing that one nation, the German, got united. , then why the European union and the remaining world community are silent about the DURAN LINE that it must also be removed WHICH separates one nation Pukhutun in two parts?

IS IT NOT A DOUBLE STANDARD?


Crimea

Crimea

  • Russia
     Russia says that Crimea is the historical land of Russia , that’s why it was the right of Russia to annex the CRIMEA to Russian Federation in 2014.

But why Russia does not consider the Pukhtun Land Pukhtukhwa as a Part of Afghanistan Which is also historical land of Afghanistan.

IS IT NOT A DOUBLE STANDARD?

When in 1996 with the help  of Pakistan , Taliban came into power in Afghanistan , Pakistan recognized it, but the same type of government , Pakistan will never accept on the territory of Pakistan. Pakistan just wanted to push Afghanistan to the stone age. That is the policy of Pakistan towards Afghanistan since its birth in 1947.

Pakistan Taliban

Pakistan Taliban

Afghan Taliban

Afghan Taliban

Pakistan supports and call the Afghan Taliban the freedom fighters and also says that they are good taliban but the Taliban who are fighting against Pakistan are  called bad Taliban by Pakistan. However both of these Taliban are the proxies of Pakistan which uses them not only in Afghanistan but in Kashmir and India too.

Is it not a double standard?

Pakistan says that there must be a Pakistan friendly government in Afghanistan for which Pakistan has been destroying Afghanistan since its birth in 1947. But then India also has the same right to destroy Pakistan because all the times in Pakistan, the governments in Pakistan are not friendly to India. But if the international community will not support Inida in this situation, then IT IS DOUBLE STANDARD.

The five EVILS

The five EVILS

Was Pakistan the leader of all Islamic nations ?  but if this was the case , Pakistan should not have boundaries. That is indeed what some Pakistani Islamists believe : “Muslims of all over the world must realize that nationalism is KUFR.”
Pakistani leaders claimed that they and Pakistan were purely Islamic and represented Islam.
Islam was and still remains the ultimate excuse, the lever that is used in Pakistan to justify any thing. For Pakistan, Islam has served as a tool to be used when convenient, to get aid or to deflect blame or to accuse any adversary of misdeeds.

8

Is it not a double standard?

The Army generals (looters) are planning how to loot Pakistan more and more.

The Army generals (looters) are planning how to loot Pakistan more and more.

If Pakistan obtained Military and economic aid from the USA , it was because Islam was naturally against communism. Opposing Pakistan was anti-Islamic. Pakistani Leaders divert attention of the people to India to use Islam. The threat from India became the common denominator for all Pakistani actions, for postponing elections and for postponing development of Pakistan indefinitely. The money poured into Pakistan in the cold war time used to strengthen the army  and not for developmental projects. By the excuse of National security state , the sentiments against India were maintained to keep the people mindset busy. No need for elections. Money and economy was not a problem. Allah ( GOD) who had given Pakistan to the faithful, was providing funds and arms via the USA. But instead of all this , more than 80% of Pakistan population considers USA an enemy.
Is not a double standard?

11Slogan by Pakistan army , India would be defeated. But as repeated Pakistan assaults against India failed like in 1948 Kashmir war, 1965 war , 1971 war and Kargil war. Pakistani people had to starve , sacrifice and allow their army to get stronger , so that Islam could be upheld against India, the number one threat to Pakistan and there fore to Islam. But ISLAM was never practiced in Pakistan and the holy name of Islam was just misused just a tool for its vested interests,

Is it not a double standard?

Afghanistan is burning by Pakistan

Afghanistan is burning by Pakistan

No method was ruled out , no sacrifice could be too great in opposing India, because opposing India meant devotion to Islamic ideas. Muslim in Kashmir and later all the Muslims in India would be rescued from Hindu tyranny by Pakistan.But Afghanistan is a Muslim country then why Pakistan destroyed Afghanistan and this policy of Pakistan toward Afghanistan continues till to date. And  its own people in East Pakistan were slaughtered. Why? they were not only Muslims but their own contrymen.
Is it not a double standard?

12In Pakistan , Islam gradually became the tool , the prop , used to make every opinion or move. The Islamic card was used by every body in Pakistan to suit their own purpose. The Pakistani Elite, migrants from India, holding all the important posts, saw their positions threatened by prospect of elections which would unseat them in favor of locals. Elections were always a threat that had to be postponed or cancelled and an imaginary threat to Islam was invoked. Muslim migrants from East Punjab and further East in India shaped the psyche of the new nation along feelings. To be sure , Pakistani leaders , for decades behaved as though Pakistan was Islam and Islam was Pakistan. But to slaughter Bengalis in East Pakistan was a part of Pakistan not of India?
Is it not double standard?

Under age daughter of Din shah( Jinnah best friend).

Under age daughter of Din shah( Jinnah best friend).

stanley wolpert

stanley wolpert

According to Stanley Wolper,the Partition was a great tragedy. It was a terrible rush job. Even before the independence , Mohd Ali Jinnah had called the flag of his political Party , Muslim league, as the flag of Islam and had said that” you can not separate the Muslim league from Islam”. But Jinnah himself was not only an infidel  but morally corrupt person , back stabbing his best friend Din Shan , having inappropriate relationship with his under age daughter when Jinnah was 43 years old and living in Din Shah’s  house as a guest.This old man jinnah,one leg in the coffin, was the worst person , the world has ever seen. He wanted to be the governor genereal throught the sea of blood of the innocent peopel Then how such a morally corrupt , and infidel person  could be the champion of Islam.
Was it not a double standard?

Jinnah ( the evil) and Gandhiji ( the angel).

Jinnah ( the evil) and Gandhiji ( the angel).

In January, 1948 Gandhi ji was assassinated and in September, 1948 ,Jinnah died. The reaction of the American government was that ” the man of hate,Jinnah, gets a peaceful death and a man of peace’ Gandhi ji , gets a violent death”.

Dr.Khan Sahib, chief minister of NWFP in 1947

Dr.Khan Sahib, chief minister of NWFP in 1947

During Partition in 1947 all provincial governments were given the rights to decide to whom they want to annex with ,either to Pakistan or India but this right was snatched from the province of NWFP now Khyber Pukhtunkhwa where the government was against the partition.
Was it not a double standard?

In Lahor resolution in 1940, the name of Pakistan had not been metioned at all.

In Lahor resolution in 1940, the name of Pakistan had not been metioned at all.

In East and West Pakistan the population of Bengalis was 54 % of the whole population of Pakistan and that of Punjab was 25%. But in Army, Judiciary and in civil-military establishment (TROIKA) , Punjabis were more than 80%. Why the other nationalities were not given the equal respective share in these institutions? Because by these this TORIKS , Punjab has made the other nationalities in Pakistan its hostages.
Is it not a double standard.

When the allocation of national assembly seats was taking place, it numbered 400 seats. Due to the population East Pakistan had to be given  225 seats, but the above mentioned TROIKA imposed on East Pakistan to accept only 200 seats by force. But in wast Pakistan Punjab claimed that their population is more than the other provinces, so we must be given  55 % seats in West Pakistan and Punjabi got which continues till to date.
Is it not a double standard?

17After 1971 when General Ziaul Haq started a campaign of islamization of Pakistan Army and strengthen process of islamization of Pakistan started by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto , Islamic texts were being introduced into Pakistani Military training. Middle ranking officers had to take courses and examination on Islam. There were also serious attempts underway to define an Islamic Military doctrine, so as to fight in accordance with the Kuran. And thus this was the Islamization of Army. But the high ranked officer and Generals were not considering Islam necessary in their and their families way of life.
is it not a double standard?

And zia ul haq, a  cunning fox, was not fulfilling his promises with the people of Pakistan which is against Islamic primcipals.

Maudoodi with President Ayub Khan

Maudoodi with President Ayub Khan

For Mullahs ( Islamic scholars) of Pakistan , any thing less than an Islamic state has always been a threat. They have only a vested interest in the Islamic state for power gain and employment. It explains why Maulana Maudoodi was against Jinnah, calling him the great infidel . He was also calling Pakistan , Napakistan,  but went to Pakistan as he saw no role for him in secular , democratic  India.With every one in Pakistan , the people , the bureaucracy , the army and mullahs seemingly being in agreement with each other on the question of Islamic state of Pakistan, where they have no problem. But that didn’t happen. Every group in Pakistan needed Islam only for their narrow self interest. The Idea of an Islamic state seemed noble enough , but making it reality was easier said than done. The Ideal Islamic state existed at the time of the Prophet Mohammad ( PBUH) time only.

19A very popular slogan in Pakistan was Pakistan ka matlab kya  , La Ilaha Illallah. God will secure Pakistan. But when Pakistan was disintegrating in 1971 , God did not want to secure it , because it was fake state based on fraud and lies only. How could God forgive Pakistan ( Punjabistan) for the massacre of three million Bengalis and rape of four hundrend thousuands ( 4 00 000) Bengali women by Pakistan army.

Pakistani military dictators

Pakistani military dictators

The terrorist Hafiz saeed with other terrorists in Pakistan

The terrorist Hafiz saeed with other terrorists in Pakistan

Pakistan Army was prepared for to take power which held on to power directly or indirectly all the time. Other forces in Pakistan who wanted  power and influence , such as politicians or bureaucrats and the Ulema used the army to reach some accommodation with the Army. And it was all done on the name of ALLAH. Any thing Pakistan did was done using the holy  name of Islam. And every one came on Pakistan on the name of Islam . However they knew it that Pakistan itself was the embodiment of Islam. Criticism of Pakistan was criticism of Islam. Pakistani leaders were always right, always Islamic and they compelled their people to be more and more Islamic. And thus gradually the non-Muslim minorities of Pakistan were squeezed out . They had no role in Islamic state.
Is it not a double standard?

Pakistan Army, the ruler and influential people of Pakistan did not have to be all that Islamic. Pure Islam was for serfs and underlings. The elite stayed rich , and the army richer and their modern liberal life style conveyed to the impression of a progressive society to western aid givers.
Is it not a double standard?

2625Pakistan alliance with USA , ensured that foreign aid poured in and the economy of the wealthy in Pakistan boomed. Rich got money , Army got weapon and money while the poor of Pakistan got Madrassas ( Islamic schools) to ensure that they become more Islamic. In madrassas they preached jihad , jihad against the enemies of Islam. In order to be good Muslims, Pakistani were urged to do Jihad not only the internal but external violence of the Army Generals and their game for military domination. More and more Pakistani were needed to fight Pakistan wars , like in Kashmir, India and in Afghanistan. The army  ,the elites getting richer and the mullah is also secure and happy to get money on the name of Madrassas , ensured the delivery of any number of men to fight for Pakistan, for Islam. Each Islamic Jihadi brought up in the Madrassas ,was ready to die for a cause ready to embrace and accept the guaranteed benefits of dying in Jehad in an afterlife to be enjoyed in a well-stocked heaven. And these men prepared for and died fighting for the cause that they had been told was Islamic.  The people who trained them and sent them to die, the army and the mullahs got fatter and more powerful. This glorious scene became Pakistan version of Islam.

27

All madrassas are under the government control.

All madrassas are under the government control.

Rich Generals doing office jobs while men from the poor classes with little to live for were trained. indoctrinated and prepared for death.The Islam of Pakistani Mullahs in league with lazy Generals , aiding the general’s wars , preaching  Islam that would keep the mullahs comfortable in this life while their students were encouraged to seek the pleasure of the afterlife, obtainable only by violence and death.
Has it not been a double standard?

As the institutions of Pakistan failed in this unique and unorthodox concept of a nation, the faith of Islam grew stronger.Co-opting the Pakistani citizen under the Islamic banner eminently served the interests of the rich , corrupt elites and army of Pakistan in maintaining their grip and preserving their business and territorial interests. And this way in the real sense Pakistan  as a state died.

Step by step out of its Islamic striving ,Pakistan has undone the rule of Law it had inherited from the British and replaced it with nothing.

2930Over the centuries Islam reached a balance with the cultures of the people who adopted Islam. Arab culture had existed in Arabs for centuries  before Islam was born. Arab culture adopted and internationalized Islam which was born in Arabia. Egyptians live in peace with their past and do not seek to deny the ancient, pre-Islamic civilization  of pharaohs who build the pyramids. An entire literature and culture of Islam developed in Persia , using the Persian language . Islam spread peacefully in Indonesia  , absorbed and rationalized by the local culture. Similarly Islam developed in India with its own unique literature, art and architecture provided by intermingling of different rich cultures . It took about 1000 years where only Pashtun dynasty was 350 years. But Pakistan sought to deny this vibrant entity. And promoting Urdu culture , Pakistan destroyed the culture, language and history of Pukhtuns, Baloch , Sindhi and minorities.

Is it not double standard?

32
Jinnah proclaimed : Hindu and Muslims belong to two different religious philosophies , social customs , literature to two different civilization that they derive their  inspiration from different sources of history  with different epics , different heroes and different episodes. We wish our people he declared , to develop to the fullest our spiritual culture , economic, social and political life in a way that we think the best and in consonance with our own ideals and according  to the genius of our people.

But how Pakistan  could be stripped of the rich culture , Islam had developed for centuries of interaction in India. But after Pakistan came into being , the leaders of  Pakistan certainly felt that Pakistan should be stripped of all its connections with India and Afghanistan.

is it not  double standard?

In an experimental and unparalleled  act of ignorance, Pakistan was deliberately set on the path of being an orphan, cultre-less nation. Pakistan was not Arabic, it was not Egyptian or Persian ,it was not Indonesia  and there is no more India.The only thing people know was that Pakistanis would have to be Islamic and good Muslims. But as a result Pakistan is on the brink to be a failed state with all respects.                       

Why Pakistan is crying?

Line of Control LOC

Line of Control LOC

The border between Pakistan and India, line of control (LOC), India cosiders it international border, but Pakistan does not regcognize is international border. Now Inida is building a wall on the indian side to prevent Pakistan infiltration. So Pakisan is crying why India is building the wall.

 

Ditch on the Durand line

Ditch on the Durand line

But on the other hand, Durnd line between Pakistan and Afghanistan , Pakistan recognizes it international border  but Afghnaistan does not recognize it international border. So first Pakistan tried to build a wall on this line but when Pakistan was not succedded , now they are digging 11-foot deep and 14-feed wide ditch along the Durand line.
Is it not a double standard?

THE COMING years are likely to see the crucial battle in the clash of civilizations between the West led by the United States and NATO on one side and jihadi Islam on the other side. Being an epicenter of Jehadism ,Pakistan will be the battlefield. Pakistan will be the central policy challenge to the world and especially to United states of America.
All the sanctuaries of the militants are located in Pakistan but USA and NATO have been bombing the territories in Afghanistan but why not in Pakistan.
Is it not a double standard?

The Afghan problem cannot be solved without solving the Pakistan problem. De-Talibanisation of Afghanistan necessitates de-Talibanisation of Pakistan but how ? because Pakistan Army engendered the Taliban and other jihadi organizations to use them for their proxy wars in Afghanistan and which also bleed India through a thousand cuts.
But if the world community is bombing other terrorist orgnizations world wide but not in Pakistan.
Then Is it not a double standard?

35

A recent Photo of Darvesh Mosque students in Peshawar with the army.

A recent Photo of Darvesh Mosque students in Peshawar with the army.

Pakistan Army, especially the Inter-Services Intelligence ISI appear to be still confident that they will be able to use the jihadis for their purposes. The jihadis are spreading their cult and their control over increasing areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan , Therefore as the US-NATO forces intensify their operations against Taliban , the Pakistani generals and civil society will have to make up their minds on which side they are going to be. But due to the double cross game of Pakistan, the present situation has to get worse before it can get better.
USA cannot afford to accept defeat in Afghanistan-Pakistan region. The global war against Pakistan sponsored terrorism in Pakistan-Afghanistan region as its epicenter will continue.But for how long the international community will afford the dirty role of Pakistan in the peace loving world.
Is it not a double standard?

38On the other hand Greater Afghanistan (free Afghanistan plus occupied Afghanistan,PUKHTUNKHWA), and Baluchistan will provide an extensive corridor for trade , transportation , energy and industry , stretching from Gwadar at the mouth of the Persian Gulp to the northern reaches of the country and beyond to China and Central Asia. Goods , Engery and Services will flow from North to South and vice versa, as also East – West to the Gulp region and South Asia. But Punjab has changed the original China Pakistan economy corridor ( CPEC) route to another route for the benefits of Punjab  from which Pukhtunkhwa, Afghanistan and Baouchistan will be suffered.
Is china not playing a double standard to accept this new route?


There are hell a lot of energy resources and minerals in Baluchistan and Greater Afghanistan . Both Afghanistan and Baluchistan will offer economic activities in Trade, Transportation , Energy and manufacturing to every group or nation that wants to invest in a rapidly growing , strategically positioned economy. The approach to central asian countries will also be of great benefit not only for the region but for the world too,  An open economy with many international stakeholders will also be an excellent incentive for peace expansion of potential influence in the region. Greater Afghanistan and Baluchistan will be active players in regional and international cooperation , with a competitive enabling environment for innovation and investment. 
But the main hurdle is Pakistan which will never allow to do that . So the prosperity of the region depends upon the existence of Pakistan, if Pakistan will exist , there will be no peace and prosperity not only in that region but  in the world as well. But where is the international community?
Is it not a double standard to tollerate a fake state of Pakistan?

There fore ,  Pakistan must be made a part of History , if the peaceful world want to live in prosperity and terrorist free environment.

39But in contrast to it , since 9/11 the US has provided Pakistan – or more accurately the Pakistani military – with more than $20 billions in aid. It’s a huge sum which some believe has prevented the country from slipping into bankruptcy. But playing a double cross game , Pakistan has been using that money to reorganize the Taliban and al-Qaeda to fight against the NATO and USA forces in Afghanistan and also to crush the Pukhtun’s , Baloch and Sindh national liberation movements in Pakistan. I am not mentioning here about the US aid since 1947.
Here, question arises.: why should America, itself facing a massive debt mountain, be giving money to Pakistan’s military leaders if they fail to offer full support to US goals in South Asia?
Is it not a double standard?

After 9/11 America and its allies invaded Afghanitsn, because the plan of 9/11 had been prepared in Afghanistan. In Afghanistan there were training camps of Alqaeda. However, no Afghani was involved in 9/11 tragedy. Taliban had been horboring these Alqaeda terrorists abd that was the reason that Afghanistan was invaded.
But when US army , NATO and other forces ISAF came to Afghanistan , they knew that the terrorists and militants are trained in Pakistan based training camps, and these militants and terrorists were  financed  and equipped by Pakistan Army and Pakistan intelligence organization ISI for their proxy war in Afghanistan then why US , NATO and ISAF forces were not invading Pakistan. 

Is it not a double standard?

Pakistan is preparing for American defeat in Afghanistan. In fact, it has been doing so for nearly a decade. Within weeks of America’s 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, Pakistan concluded the Americans could not win there. US now preparing to pull out, leaving behind a Taliban movement, Pakistan’s generals feel their assessment has been fully vindicated.

Describing Pakistan as “time bomb”, Mr.Fareed  Zakaria warned that as long as this military and its mind-set are unchecked and unreformed, the US will face a strategic collapse as it withdraws its forces from the region.

Pakistan Army personnels and Jihadists.

Pakistan Army personnels and Jihadists.

Now should Washington support Pakistan when it is preparing for the increasingly likely prospect of a government in Kabul that will have Taliban ministers? And yet every time the US has discussed cutting Pakistan’s funding, it has ended up paying even more. It means that the Washington deserves what Pakistan has been doing with them in the shape of double cross game? 

At the same time , USA along with other world community , must not forget that “more stable Pakistan is, the more jihadis it will produce”, because Jehadism, terrorism, fundamentalism and extremist are the integral parts of Pakistan’s foreign policy. But to give free hand to Pakistan to do that is not a DOUBLE STANDARD?

When Pakistan became nuclear power with the US aid , one minister even threatened the world community and specially USA “We are now A nuclear state,” he said. “So no-one can let us go bust. We may have turned down billions of dollars. But many more billions will follow.” It means he was right? But USA is fighting against terrorism sponsored and supported by Pakistan  but still America is giving more and more aid to Pakistan.
Is it not a double standard?

40

Pakistan has been interfering in the internal affairs of Afghanistan to destabilize and destroy it, because Pakistan has occupied the land of Afghanistan from Durand line to Indus river, PUKHTUNKHWA . Every nation has certain core values. These are fundamental traits that provide sustenance to it for its existence. Normally, these are positive attributes which are considered non-negotiable and unalterable. So Afghanistan has the right to defend its existed land and recapture its own lost land, Pukhtunkhwa.

But if the international community is turning dear year or blind eye about it , then it is double standard.

On the other hand ,Pakistan’s core values are based on the warped political principles of ‘hate and hurt” Afghanistan and India at all costs.

41The whole world considers Pakistan to be an untrustworthy and deceitful nation.Sine 1974 Pakistan was telling a lie to the world community that it had not been developing the nuclear bomb but on May 28,  1998 ,  it blosted a number of  Nuclear tests. Pakistan started its track record with treachery. Pakistan remains incorrigible as a devious and cunning neighbor .Due to decades of brainwashing, all Pakistanis suffer from an extremely brutal and vicious anti-Indian and anti- Afghanistan streak.

India and Afghanistan must remember Winston Churchill’s advisory, “The further backwards you look, the further forward you can see”. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

The world community must know that a united Pakistan is not only threat for  India’s and Afghanistan’s interests but Pakistan is threat to the peace of the world.. There cannot be a more blinkered view.

42

NOW THE TIME HAS COME THAT PAKISTAN MUST BE SANDWITCHED BETWEEN INDIA AND AFGHANISTAN.

Afghanistan gave sacrifice of two millions afghans , that’s why former Soviet Union disintegrated , Berlin Wall was removed , the East European countries freed  and the cold war became a part of histry. Now it is the moral obligation of the world community to help Aghanistan to recapture their land occupied by Pakistan from Durand line to Indus river, PUKHTUNKHWA.

The balkazniation of Yugoslavia is the recent past example

The Foreign Secretary of British India, Sir Henry Mortimer Durand and the King of Afghanistan, Amir Abdul Rahman Khan signed a lease agreement on November 12, 1893, for the demarcation of borders between Afghanistan and British India. This lease agreement was for a period of one hundred years.:A 99-year lease was, under historic common law, the longest possible term of a lease.
And till today 99-year leases continue to be common as a matter of business practice and conventional wisdom,like the famous Hong Kong agreement for 99 years and Guantanamo naval base agreement for 99 years and so on. So the Durand line agreement has expired in 1993. There fore,  Durand line has no legitimacy and that artificially divides the Pukhtoon people.

But if in any lease agreement , the duration is not mentioned , then it is automatically considered as the 99 years lease. However, it can be canceled at any time.

Now throughout the civilied world is against the Russian’s aggression to occupy Crimea , Ukrainian’s territory. But similarly in 1849 the British Empire also occupied Afghanistan territory from Durand line to Indus River, it means that was also agression. And after 1947 partition of India , the British Empire handed over Afghan territory to Pakistan. But if the world community now does not consider aggression the British Empire’s occupation of Afghan territory  in 1849 and consider Russia’s occupation of Crimea aggression , then IT IS DOUBLE STANDARD.

Once during Zia ul Haq regime , the D.G, of ISI General Akhar Abdur Reham had also said that Kabul must burn because 1993 was around corner when the durand line agreement was expiring.They also burnt East Pakistan but the brave Bengali defeated them and got freedom from the terrorist and occupying state of Pakistan.

Therefore , all Afghans both in free Afghanistan and occupied Afghanistan, Pukhtunkhwa, must now unite with their baloch brother to get rid of Pakistan and make it a part of history.

General Hanid Gul ex-chief of ISI

General Hanid Gul ex-chief of ISI

General Hamid Gul said in a TV interview on January 26, 2015 that” America never trusted us and we never trusted America. We supported America in Afghan Jihad for our own benefits. We built nuclear bomb, got F-16 Fighters , submarine, helicopters and a lot of other defense equipment.” Pakistan used America and the international community for its own benefits in Afghanistan.

Bruce Riedel

Bruce Riedel

Bruce Riedel:  Pakisan was born in great violence  and it is becoming a more violent state. For years friends of Pakistan have warned that by harboring terrorists , Pakistan risked being devoured by terrorism. Now these fears seem all too real. Of course , Pakistan is much more than just a problem for U.S.counterterrorism policy.  The United states and Pakistan have had a very conflicted relationship for over half a centruy. They have a dysfuctional marriage that goes through courtship , marriage , and divorce over and over agian.

Martin Walker

Martin Walker

Washington-based British journalist Martin Walker in a column wrote “Some Pakistanis see Washington’s dark influence behind new agitation for the creation of Pukhtunistan, an attempt to unite the Pukhtun tribes divided by the Afghan-Pakistan frontier”. They believe that the US is doing for the reason that “a secular, nationalist ideology can effectively counter the growing influence of religious parties in Pukhtun areas”. Somehow, it is speculated that the US is backing the claim of the “Greater Pukhtunistan”, 

Selig Harrison

Selig Harrison

Asia scholar Selig Harrison writes, “sending Punjabi soldiers into Pashtun territory to fight jihadists pushes the country ever closer to an ethnically defined civil war, strengthening Pashtun sentiment for an independent ‘Pashtunistan.’

But all Pukhtuns will accept Pukhtunistan under the flag of Greater Afghanistan. Their historical land is from Indus River to Oxus River.

Stanley A. Weiss

Stanley A. Weiss

Stanley A. Weiss the Founding Chairman of Business Executives for National Security, writes:
After all, this is no longer the “Great Game.” We remember our sons and daughters who have laid down their lives defending a BYGONE BRITISH BOUNDARY. ( Durand Line)

The time has come to ask: where do we draw the line?

The position of Afghanistan is crystal clear. Its historical land is from Indus river to Oxus river. So from Indus river to oxus river Great Afghanistan is the dream of all Afghans both in free Afghanistan and occupied Afghanistan,” PUKHTNKHWA.

Afghan government said about Durand Line that “ it tores us apart. Our sincere and honest brotherhood with the Pukhtuns and Baloch has been sanctified by history. They have been one body in the course of history and live together like one brother. Now the waves of their love and brotherhood extend from the Oxus to Indus. And they want to live side by side , embrace each other and demonstrate this great love to the world at large.

Both in free Afghanistan and occupied Afghanistan , Pukhtunkhwah, the Pukhtun nationalists have continued to harbor dreams of a Great Afghanistan.

Former President of Afghanistan Hamid kerzai described the Durand Line as a “ Line of HATE” which raised a wall between two brothers.

So  Afghans all over the world must propagate on social media and tell the real history to the world  and get ready to make Great Afghanistan from Indus river to Oxus.

 Mashal PicWriter:
Mashal Khan Takkar
Editor in Chief
THE VOICE TIMES

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITH ” THE VOICE TIMES”    

Be the first to comment on "Why double standard ?"

Leave a comment